Ron Paul's aura leaves GOP, Romney in tricky spot
Ron Paul's backkkkkkkk
Source
Ron Paul's aura leaves GOP, Romney in tricky spot
Aug. 24, 2012 12:29 PM
Associated Press
TAMPA, Fla. -- Mitt Romney loyalists, seeking a show of strength and solidarity at next week's GOP convention, struggled Friday to placate restless Ron Paul supporters while also weakening the powers of such insurgent candidates in future Republican primaries.
Pre-convention haggling annoyed devoted backers of Paul, the 77-year-old Texas congressman who was among Romney's primary challengers. One Republican National Convention panel voted to replace 10 delegates from Maine who are supportive of Paul, deciding that they came to Tampa through a flawed state selection process. A second pro-Romney committee moved to adopt a rule narrowing the routes for delegates to national conventions in 2016 and beyond.
"It sends the message that when the establishment doesn't get the outcome they want they will use the process to change it," said Mike Rothfeld of Virginia, who tried in vain to block the ouster of Maine's delegates partial to Paul. "It will not be good for the party. It will not be good for Mitt Romney."
Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, comfortably has more delegates than needed to win the nomination. His bid to unseat Democratic President Barack Obama is on course to be tight in November, leaving little room for error.
The skirmishes with Paul supporters highlight lingering tensions between wings of the party ahead of a convention geared around unity. In a peace offering, Romney's campaign announced plans to air a video tribute to the libertarian-leaning Paul during the convention.
Paul didn't win a single presidential primary, yet he was able to amass 177 delegates, according to the Associate Press tally. That's due to an intense effort, particularly in caucus states, to swarm state conventions that took place after the primary elections. His followers won a majority of delegate slots in Iowa, Maine, Minnesota and Nevada.
But the Maine delegation underwent a makeover on the convention's eve. After several hours of discussion, the credentials committee voted overwhelmingly to substitute 10 Paul delegates with 10 aligned with Romney.
William McGinley, a lawyer pressing the case for the delegate swap, said the Maine convention was invalid because it was riddled with problems. Some party officials complained of lax floor security and dubious identification of participants.
McGinley said Paul's supporters "shouldn't be able to benefit from this chaos."
Paul's allies said it was Romney's team that threw up obstacles back in May.
Committee members who backed the substitutions said it was a stand against unruly conventions even if it cost some people access to a convention they spent thousands of dollars to attend.
"This body has to send a message back for future conventions," said Bob Brunjes of Washington state.
The move had immediate repercussions. Maine Gov. Paul LePage, a delegate himself, said he would skip the convention because of the discord. Another remaining delegate, former state lawmaker Stavros Mendros, predicted it would hamper the GOP's bid to snatch an electoral vote in Maine given its process of awarding those based on geographic vote totals.
"It's going to be a disaster back home," Mendros said. "People are going to be out for blood."
In an adjoining ballroom, allies of Romney worked to make it harder for insurgent presidential candidates such as Paul to have a big voice in future nominating conventions. GOP rule-makers voted to tie the selection of convention delegates to the results of each state's Republican primary. Supporters of the rule change said primary voters expect national convention delegates to be loyal to the primary winner.
The proposed change is subject to a later vote on a large rules package.
The flare-ups put a damper on the Romney team's other efforts recently team to make Paul followers feel included in key decisions.
For instance, the platform committee Tuesday adopted a draft document that includes several planks backed by Paul delegates, including proposals to audit the Federal Reserve and seek a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.
Advisers to Paul said he was not looking to cause a scene in Tampa.
Paul was not expected to address the convention though he had plans to headline a rally Sunday at a Tampa college football stadium. Paul's son, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, scored a prime-time convention speaking slot next week. Rand Paul is seen as an heir to his father's political machine.
Despite his sharp disagreements with Paul on foreign policy and other issues, Romney never engaged in the often sharp back-and-forth during the nominating campaign that he did with former rivals Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum.
Senior Romney aide Russ Schriefer, who has overseen the convention plans, said the film that will air Tuesday night is a nod to Romney's respect for Paul.
"Governor Romney and Congressman Paul, while they certainly disagree on many issues, they always have had, if you've watched part of the debate this year, a lot of mutual respect between the two of them," Romney adviser Russ Schriefer told reporters Friday.
----
Associated Press writers Glenn Adams in Augusta, Maine, Stephen Ohlemacher in Washington and Charles Babington and Thomas Beaumont in Tampa contributed.
Ron Paul says Republican Party is not my party
Source
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Ron Paul says Republican Party is not my party
By ALEX YAP
Hearst Washington Bureau
Last week, Mitt Romney wowed conservatives at the Republican National Convention, but one Texas representative remains unimpressed.
Former presidential candidate Ron Paul, who was described by the master of ceremonies at his Tampa campaign rally last Sunday as a “clean boat in a sea of garbage,” still has not endorsed the Republican presidential candidate.
In an interview with Bloomberg, Paul even went so far as to say the Republican Party was not his party — and is, in many ways, irrelevant.
“I do not like politics at all. I think both parties are Keynesian economists, and support positions that I do not like,” said Paul.
Paul, who was a distant runner-up for the Republican nomination, called the former Massachusetts governor”s acceptance speech “upbeat,” “pro-American,” and acknowledged that the audience was won over, but said that he remains “very, very skeptical of hearing anything that will change the course of history.”
He even lambasted the GOP’s guest speaker Clint Eastwood for implying that Romney and his supporters were unhappy with current policies, but for failing to suggest any changes.
Paul said he thinks the current economic crisis is much worse than the one we faced in 2008, but that debt is a problem no one is willing to face and one that Romney and friends failed to address during the convention.
“Hopefully [Romney] is right and he’s going to create all these jobs, but quite frankly, only the market creates jobs. Governments can’t and presidents don’t do it,” Paul said.
Ron Paul calls for 'love,' 'free market economics' in final address
Ron Paul - Government sucks and it's getting worse.
Ron Paul didn't say that, but I think that is pretty much his final message.
Source
Ron Paul calls for 'love,' 'free market economics' in final address
By Morgan Little
November 15, 2012, 10:18 a.m.
Libertarian icon and three-time presidential hopeful Ron Paul delivered his final address on the House floor Wednesday, admitting that while he sees little progress in favor of his defined cause of freedom, he sees a chance the tide can turn as he steps away from Congress.
Paul, a Republican who leans heavily toward libertarianism and has served Texas’ 22nd District intermittently since 1976, admitted that “according to conventional wisdom,” his tenure on Capitol Hill has “accomplished very little.”
“No named legislation, no named federal buildings or highways – thank goodness. In spite of my efforts, the government has grown exponentially, taxes remain excessive and the prolific increase of incomprehensible regulations continues,” Paul said. “Wars are constant and pursued without congressional declaration, deficits rise to the sky, poverty is rampant and dependency on the federal government is now worse than any time in our history.”
Paul painted a portrait of a country with “no loot left to divvy up,” approaching a fiscal cliff “much bigger” than the one looming Jan. 1 and impending authoritarianism. Doom accompanied gloom in spades, with Paul’s frustration with his inability to stem what he sees as the constriction of freedom evident as he spoke.
It’s rare to find a member of Congress speaking from the floor and condemning the nation’s trajectory over the last century, accusing the populace of becoming beguiled by “endless” wealth, but there Paul was.
“As long as most people believed the material abundance would last forever, worrying about protecting a competitive productive economy and individual liberty seemed unnecessary,” he said.
The only solution Paul sees, as he makes a transition from lawmaker to figurehead, is “an intellectual awakening,” one that hearkens back to the founders’ views on civil liberties and eschews what Paul sees as the collusion between Democrats and Republicans.
“Everyone claims support for freedom. But too often it’s for one’s own freedom and not for others. Too many believe that there must be limits to freedom,” Paul said. “They argue that freedom must be directed and managed to achieve fairness and equality, thus making it acceptable to curtail, through force, certain liberties.”
“The best chance for achieving peace and prosperity, for the maximum number of people worldwide, is to pursue the cause of liberty,” he concluded.
Paul’s speech was met with some applause, but was ultimately overshadowed by President Obama’s post-election news conference, which was already halfway over, and relegated to C-SPAN’s online streams. Which, ultimately, seems appropriate for a man whose underdog status has drawn increasingly large numbers to his cause, and whose supporters frequently clash with the Republican Party establishment.
In the end, perhaps nothing better summarizes Paul than a plea he made toward the end of his speech, in which he asked the nation to forego envy, greed and intolerance and supplant them with “love, compassion, tolerance and free-market economics.”
More Ron Paul Articles
Previous
articles
on Ron Paul for President.
More
articles
on Ron Paul for President.